ARTICLE
Richard Ericson
Richard Ericson (born 1946) is an American economist, Professor of Economics at Columbia University, and a leading authority on the Soviet-type economic system, transition economic
Richard Ericson (born 1946) is an American economist, Professor of Economics at Columbia University, and a leading authority on the Soviet-type economic system, transition economics, and comparative economic systems. He earned his Ph.D. from UC Berkeley and taught at Harvard before moving to Columbia.
Ericson is best known for his formal characterization of the "classical Soviet-type economic system," which he modeled as a coherent institutional arrangement rather than a collection of ad hoc distortions. This work explained why chronic "priority shortages"—where key inputs were systematically withheld from lower-priority sectors to feed high-priority targets—were intrinsic features of the system's equilibrium, not mere inefficiencies. He analyzed how taut plans, soft budget constraints, and the ratchet effect created perverse incentives: managers hoarded labor, underreported capacity, and inflated input requests. His formal proofs showed that such a system could achieve forced industrialization in the short run but would inevitably suffer from technological stagnation.
After the Soviet collapse, Ericson turned to transition economics. He became a prominent critic of Russia's "shock therapy," arguing that abrupt price liberalization and privatization without functioning market institutions produced catastrophic outcomes—asset stripping, barterization, and oligarchic capitalism rather than a genuine market economy. He advocated for gradual, institution-building reform.
Ericson also engaged the socialist calculation debate with modern formal arguments. Drawing on information economics and mechanism design, he argued that any system simulating markets through central planning faces insurmountable computational and incentive problems, updating the tradition of Mises and Hayek with contemporary tools.
Key contributions: formal model of the classical Soviet-type system; theory of priority shortages and taut planning; critique of shock therapy; modern analysis of the socialist calculation problem.